At Viddler, we are working on HTML5 feverishly but allow me to do a quick brain dump on personal thoughts on HTML5. It’s guaranteed that this list will change over time.
The Good:
- Lower CPU requirements
- Open standard
- Works great in mobile environments, keeps power usage low
The Bad
- No support for closed captioning
- Javascript based when you want to design the player
- Javascript is a security risk for hosted environments, like Tumblr, Facebook, WordPress.com, RSS Readers
- No Internet Explorer support (coming in IE9)
- Lack of Security on Stream. tags need open access to streams.
- Ad Serving Not Possible, initial implementations include giving out Javascript tags
- Autoplays randomly when loading pages using default tag
- No Room for Interactive Experiences – Overlays/Sharing functionality/
As of today, support HTML5, it’s great in mobile experiences, but it has a long way to go before coming the default in desktop browsers.
2 Responses to Good and Bad of HTML5 Video
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About Me

Hello and welcome to my personal blog. My name is Robert Sandie, a digital entrepreneur, innovating with my second startup, vid.io. Join me as I update this blog on the daily challenges of startup.
Find Me:





I agree with you on this but, HTML5 is better than flash regardless. I will ALWAYS take less features over more CPU usage. I love keeping my CPU down to around 30% when watching any video.
I guess giving viewer options in browser is important. Make a valid point.